mirror of
https://github.com/tiennm99/ghstats.git
synced 2026-09-02 04:20:38 +00:00
tiennm99
accc4b62b2
Matches the Marketplace name; repo is being renamed in lockstep. - go.mod module path: github.com/tiennm99/ghstats → github.com/tiennm99/ghstats-cards - Import paths across every .go file updated. - README badges, install snippets, and the 'go install' line point to the new URL/path. - docs/deployment-guide.md workflow template, Docker image path, and release edit URL updated. Breaking for consumers pinned to the old URL; they need to swap tiennm99/ghstats → tiennm99/ghstats-cards in workflows and switch Docker pulls to ghcr.io/tiennm99/ghstats-cards. GitHub's HTTP redirect covers git clones but GHCR does NOT redirect — users must update image URIs manually.
4.9 KiB
4.9 KiB
Why Your Most-Commit-Language (All Time) Looks Like This
Reconstructed from live GraphQL data for user tiennm99 on 2026-04-18.
The card says
| Rank | Language | % |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | JavaScript | 24.96 |
| 2 | Python | 22.68 |
| 3 | C# | 19.54 |
| 4 | Go | 12.65 |
| 5 | Svelte | 11.40 |
| 6 | Other | 8.77 |
What the algorithm actually sees
Only your top 10 starred non-fork owned repos get probed, up to 500 commits each. Everything else is invisible to this card.
Your top 10 + your commits in them + linguist byte split:
| Repo | Your commits | Primary | Linguist bytes (non-prose) |
|---|---|---|---|
| time-mocker | 34 | C# | C# 100% |
| adventofcode | 15 | Go | Go 100% |
| export-telegram-group-members | 9 | Python | Python 100% |
| lottery-generator | 11 | Java | Java 100% |
| ghstats | 2 | Go | Go 100% |
| rplace | 44 | JavaScript | JS 56% · Svelte 43% · HTML/CSS ~0.4% |
| thptqg2016 | 9 | JavaScript | JS 72% · CSS 27% |
| go-util | 5 | Go | Go 100% |
| try-bmad | 35 | Python | Python 87% · JS 7% · HTML/Svelte/Groovy/CSS ~5% |
| try-claudekit | 10 | JavaScript | JS 96% |
Total commits counted: 174.
Per-language derivation
Each commit contributes 1 "vote" split by linguist byte share. Summed:
| Language | Vote from… | Total |
|---|---|---|
| JavaScript | rplace 24.71 · try-claudekit 9.64 · thptqg2016 6.50 · try-bmad 2.57 | 43.42 |
| Python | try-bmad 30.47 · export-tg 9.00 | 39.47 |
| C# | time-mocker 34.00 | 34.00 |
| Go | adventofcode 15 · go-util 5 · ghstats 2 | 22.00 |
| Svelte | rplace 19.14 · try-bmad 0.69 | 19.83 |
| Java | lottery-generator 11.00 | 11.00 |
| CSS | thptqg2016 2.40 · small others | 2.77 |
| HTML | spread across rplace/thptqg2016/try-bmad/try-claudekit | 1.13 |
| Groovy | try-bmad 0.37 | 0.37 |
Dividing by 174 → exactly matches the card (24.96% / 22.68% / 19.54% / 12.65% / 11.40% / 8.78%).
Why these rank where they do
| Language | Real story |
|---|---|
| JavaScript dominates | Three throwaway/experiment repos (rplace, try-claudekit, thptqg2016) plus a Python project that happens to ship a JS frontend (try-bmad). The 44 rplace commits alone contribute 24.7 of the 43 JS "votes" — a single weekend project is driving the #1 slot. |
| Python #2 | 77% of it (30.47 of 39.47) is try-bmad, a 35-commit scaffolding project. The 87% Python byte share there means every commit — even a README edit — gets 87% credit to Python. |
| C# #3 | Every single C# vote comes from time-mocker (34 commits, 100% C#). This is the signal with the cleanest attribution — if you committed to that repo, it was almost certainly touching C# files. |
| Go surprisingly low | Only 22 votes from three repos. ghstats itself has 2 commits in your window because most of this session's work hasn't been pushed yet; and adventofcode/go-util are one-off exercises. Your Go day-job probably lives in private repos we can't see. |
| Svelte appears out of nowhere | Linguist sees ~80KB of Svelte in rplace next to ~103KB of JS. Each of rplace's 44 commits credits 43% to Svelte — even commits that only touched .js files. That's the cost of byte-weighted attribution. |
Why it feels wrong
Four structural reasons:
- Top-10 cap. Sorted by stargazers. Your actual Go/Python dev work probably lives in repos with 0 stars but many commits — they don't make the cut.
- Private repos invisible.
ownerAffiliations: OWNER+ the token's scope. Your VNG Corp code does not appear. - Forks excluded.
isFork: false. If you hack on forks of upstream projects, those contributions vanish. - Byte-weighted ≠ file-touched. rplace credits 43% to Svelte on every commit regardless of which file you edited. A commit that fixes one line in
main.jsstill counts Svelte bytes.
What would actually fix it
Only per-commit file classification does (already scoped in earlier research — REST /commits/{sha} + go-enry). That path would:
- Count each commit by the files actually touched (Svelte only if you edited
*.svelte). - Support opt-in to cover all repos, not just top-10.
- Recover Markdown-heavy repos that currently vanish.
Cost: ~1000 REST calls per run vs. the current ~15 GraphQL calls. A toggleable -accurate-languages flag still makes sense.
Quick wins you could take without the rewrite
- Raise
-top-reposto 30–50 so less-starred but heavily-committed repos enter the sample. - Raise
-commits-per-repopast 500 if you care about lifetime depth. - Add
-exclude-repo rplace,try-bmad,try-claudekit(not implemented yet) to drop known experiment repos the way github-profile-summary-cards does.
Unresolved questions
- Do you want the
-exclude-repoflag landed now as a short-term fix? - Should we expose
ownerAffiliationsso contributed-to (non-owned) repos can be included? - Is the 500-commit cap actually binding for any of your repos, or is 174 total just "everything you've pushed"?