* update yaml frontmatter format * update abstract document * update abstract factory * use the new pattern template * acyclic visitor seo * adapter seo * ambassador seo * acl seo * aaa seo * async method invocation seo * balking seo * bridge seo * builder seo * business delegate and bytecode seo * caching seo * callback seo * chain seo * update headings * circuit breaker seo * client session + collecting parameter seo * collection pipeline seo * combinator SEO * command seo * cqrs seo * commander seo * component seo * composite seo * composite entity seo * composite view seo * context object seo * converter seo * crtp seo * currying seo * dao seo * data bus seo * data locality seo * data mapper seo * dto seo * decorator seo * delegation seo * di seo * dirty flag seo * domain model seo * double buffer seo * double checked locking seo * double dispatch seo * dynamic proxy seo * event aggregator seo * event-based asynchronous seo * eda seo * event queue seo * event sourcing seo * execute around seo * extension objects seo * facade seo * factory seo * factory kit seo * factory method seo * fanout/fanin seo * feature toggle seo * filterer seo * fluent interface seo * flux seo * flyweight seo * front controller seo * function composition seo * game loop seo * gateway seo * guarded suspension seo * half-sync/half-async seo * health check seo * hexagonal seo * identity map seo * intercepting filter seo * interpreter seo * iterator seo * layers seo * lazy loading seo * leader election seo * leader/followers seo * lockable object seo * rename and add seo for marker interface * master-worker seo * mediator seo * memento seo * metadata mapping seo * microservice aggregator seo * api gw seo * microservices log aggregration seo * mvc seo * mvi seo * mvp seo * mvvm seo * monad seo * monitor seo * monostate seo * multiton seo * mute idiom seo * naked objects & notification seo * null object seo * object mother seo * object pool seo * observer seo * optimistic locking seo * page controller seo * page object seo * parameter object seo * partial response seo * pipeline seo * poison pill seo * presentation model seo * private class data seo * producer-consumer seo * promise seo * property seo * prototype seo * proxy seo * queue-based load leveling seo * reactor seo * registry seo * repository seo * RAII seo * retry seo * role object seo * saga seo * separated interface seo * serialized entity seo * serialized lob seo * servant seo * server session seo * service layer seo * service locator seo * service to worker seo * sharding seo * single table inheritance seo * singleton seo * spatial partition seo * special case seo * specification seo * state seo * step builder seo * strangler seo * strategy seo * subclass sandbox seo * table module seo * template method seo * throttling seo * tolerant reader seo * trampoline seo * transaction script seo * twin seo * type object seo * unit of work seo * update method seo * value object seo * version number seo * virtual proxy seo * visitor seo * seo enhancements * seo improvements * SEO enhancements * SEO improvements * SEO additions * SEO improvements * more SEO improvements * rename hexagonal + SEO improvements * SEO improvements * more SEO stuff * SEO improvements * SEO optimizations * SEO enhancements * enchance SEO * improve SEO * SEO improvements * update headers
title, shortTitle, description, category, language, tag
| title | shortTitle | description | category | language | tag | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Double-Checked Locking Pattern in Java: Ensuring Thread Safety with Minimal Overhead | Double-Checked Locking | Master double-checked locking in Java with our detailed guide and practical examples. Enhance your Java design patterns knowledge today. | Concurrency | en |
|
Intent of Double-Checked Locking Design Pattern
Reduce the overhead of acquiring a lock by first testing the locking criterion (the "lock hint") without actually acquiring the lock. Only if the locking criterion appears to be true does the actual locking logic proceed. Double-checked locking in Java helps in optimizing performance and ensuring thread safety.
Detailed Explanation of Double-Checked Locking Pattern with Real-World Examples
Real-world example
In a company with a high-value equipment room, employees first check a visible sign to see if the room is locked. If the sign shows it's unlocked, they enter directly; if locked, they use a security keycard for access. This two-step verification process efficiently manages security without unnecessary use of the electronic lock system, mirroring the Double-Checked Locking pattern used in software to minimize resource-intensive operations.
In plain words
The Double-Checked Locking pattern in software minimizes costly locking operations by first checking the lock status in a low-cost manner before proceeding with a more resource-intensive lock, ensuring efficiency and thread safety during object initialization.
Wikipedia says
In software engineering, double-checked locking (also known as "double-checked locking optimization") is a software design pattern used to reduce the overhead of acquiring a lock by testing the locking criterion (the "lock hint") before acquiring the lock. Locking occurs only if the locking criterion check indicates that locking is required.
Programmatic Example of Double-Checked Locking Pattern in Java
The Double-Checked Locking pattern is used in the HolderThreadSafe class to ensure that the Heavy object is only created once, even when accessed from multiple threads. Here's how it works:
- Check if the object is initialized (first check): If it is, return it immediately.
if (heavy == null) {
// ...
}
- Synchronize the block of code where the object is created: This ensures that only one thread can create the object.
synchronized (this) {
// ...
}
- Check again if the object is initialized. If another thread has already created the object by the time the current thread enters the synchronized block, return the created object.
if (heavy == null) {
heavy = new Heavy();
}
- Return the created object.
return heavy;
Here's the complete code for the HolderThreadSafe class:
public class HolderThreadSafe {
private Heavy heavy;
public HolderThreadSafe() {
LOGGER.info("Holder created");
}
public synchronized Heavy getHeavy() {
if (heavy == null) {
synchronized (this) {
if (heavy == null) {
heavy = new Heavy();
}
}
}
return heavy;
}
}
In this code, the Heavy object is only created when the getHeavy method is called for the first time. This is known as lazy initialization. The double-checked locking pattern is used to ensure that the Heavy object is only created once, even when the getHeavy method is called from multiple threads simultaneously.
When to Use the Double-Checked Locking Pattern in Java
Use the Double-Checked Locking pattern in Java when all the following conditions are met:
- There is a singleton resource that is expensive to create.
- There is a need to reduce the overhead of acquiring a lock every time the resource is accessed.
Real-World Applications of Double-Checked Locking Pattern in Java
- Singleton pattern implementation in multithreading environments.
- Lazy initialization of resource-intensive objects in Java applications.
Benefits and Trade-offs of Double-Checked Locking Pattern
Benefits:
- Performance gains from avoiding unnecessary locking after the object is initialized.
- Thread safety is maintained for critical initialization sections.
Trade-offs:
- Complex implementation can lead to mistakes, such as incorrect publishing of objects due to memory visibility issues.
- In Java, it can be redundant or broken in some versions unless volatile variables are used with care.
Related Java Design Patterns
- Singleton: Double-Checked Locking is often used in implementing thread-safe Singletons.
- Lazy Loading: Shares the concept of delaying object creation until necessary.