* [Feat] Day-0 support for GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.5 Pro (#26449)
* feat(openai): day-0 support for GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.5 Pro
Add pricing + capability entries for the new GPT-5.5 family launched by
OpenAI on 2026-04-24:
- gpt-5.5 / gpt-5.5-2026-04-23 (chat): $5/$30/$0.50 per 1M
input/output/cached input
- gpt-5.5-pro / gpt-5.5-pro-2026-04-23 (responses-only): $60/$360/$6
per 1M input/output/cached input
Other fees (long-context >272k, flex, batches, priority, cache
discounts) follow the same ratios as GPT-5.4, with context window
retained at 1.05M input / 128K output.
No transformation / classifier code changes are required:
OpenAIGPT5Config.is_model_gpt_5_4_plus_model() already matches 5.5+ via
numeric version parsing, and model registration is driven from the
JSON. The existing responses-API bridge for tools + reasoning_effort
(litellm/main.py:970) already covers gpt-5.5-pro.
Tests:
- GPT5_MODELS regression list now covers gpt-5.5-pro and dated variants
- New test_generic_cost_per_token_gpt55_pro cost-calc test
- Updated test_generic_cost_per_token_gpt55 for long-context fields
* fix(openai): mirror reasoning_effort flags onto gpt-5.5 dated variants
gpt-5.5-2026-04-23 and gpt-5.5-pro-2026-04-23 were missing the
supports_none_reasoning_effort, supports_xhigh_reasoning_effort, and
supports_minimal_reasoning_effort flags that their non-dated
counterparts define. Reasoning-effort routing in OpenAIGPT5Config is
fully capability-driven from these JSON flags — since an absent flag
is treated as False for opt-in levels (xhigh), users pinning to a
dated snapshot would silently lose xhigh support and diverge from the
base alias on logprobs + flexible temperature handling.
Copy the flags onto both dated variants so every dated snapshot
inherits the base model's reasoning-effort capability profile.
Adds a parametrized regression test that asserts
supports_{none,minimal,xhigh}_reasoning_effort parity between each
dated variant and its non-dated counterpart, preventing future drift
when new snapshots are added.
* [Feat] Add azure/gpt-5.5 + azure/gpt-5.5-pro entries (+ dated variants) (#26361)
* feat(azure): add azure/gpt-5.5 + azure/gpt-5.5-pro entries (+ dated variants)
Azure variants of OpenAI's GPT-5.5 family. Microsoft has not yet
shipped GPT-5.5 on Azure OpenAI (latest GA on the Foundry models page
is GPT-5.4 as of 2026-04-24), but adding the entries day-0 mirrors the
established precedent for azure/gpt-5.4* (which were in the cost map
before the Azure rollout) so cost tracking and capability flags work
the moment customers deploy.
Schema follows the existing azure/gpt-5.4* shape:
- Same base/long-context pricing as openai/gpt-5.5*: $5/$30 chat,
$60/$360 pro per 1M, with priority tier 2x base
- Azure variants drop the flex/batches keys (Azure has no flex tier)
but keep priority pricing, matching gpt-5.4* precedent
- mode=chat for the thinking model, mode=responses for pro
reasoning_effort capability flags mirror the OpenAI variants exactly
since Azure proxies the same API contract: minimal rejection on both
chat and pro, low/none rejection on pro. Once #26456 (which sets
supports_low_reasoning_effort + minimal=false on openai/gpt-5.5*)
lands, OpenAI and Azure flag profiles align.
Tests pin entry presence + pricing for all four Azure variants and
verify the live-API-derived reasoning_effort flags.
* test: register supports_low_reasoning_effort in cost-map JSON schema
azure/gpt-5.5-pro and azure/gpt-5.5-pro-2026-04-23 added in this branch
carry supports_low_reasoning_effort=false. The strict
'additionalProperties: false' schema in
test_aaamodel_prices_and_context_window_json_is_valid rejected the new
key. Register it alongside the other supports_*_reasoning_effort
entries.
Note: the runtime side of this flag (code that reads it) lands in
#26456. Until that PR merges the flag is inert for both Azure and
OpenAI pro entries, but having the schema accept it lets cost-map
tests pass on either merge order.
* fix(arize/langfuse_otel): handle Pydantic usage objects without `.get`
`_set_usage_outputs` called `usage.get(...)` and
`usage.get('output_tokens_details', {}).get('reasoning_tokens')`. These
crash with `AttributeError: 'CompletionUsage' object has no attribute
'get'` when `usage` (or the nested token-details object) is a raw OpenAI
Pydantic model rather than a dict / litellm `Usage` wrapper. Reproduces
on the langfuse_otel + arize Responses API logging paths.
Fixes#13672.
Changes:
- Add `_safe_get(obj, key, default)` that prefers dict-style `.get` when
available and otherwise falls back to `getattr`. Works uniformly for
dicts, litellm's `Usage`, and plain Pydantic models like
`openai.types.completion_usage.CompletionUsage` /
`CompletionTokensDetails` / `OutputTokensDetails`.
- Use `_safe_get` for total / completion / prompt / output tokens.
- Look for reasoning tokens in `completion_tokens_details` (Chat
Completions API) before falling back to `output_tokens_details`
(Responses API). Previously reasoning tokens from the Chat Completions
API were silently dropped.
Tests:
- `test_set_usage_outputs_pydantic_completion_usage` — covers the chat
completions path with raw `CompletionUsage` + `CompletionTokensDetails`.
- `test_set_usage_outputs_pydantic_response_api_usage` — covers the
Responses API path with a Pydantic usage object lacking `.get`.
Both tests fail on main before this commit and pass after.
---------
Co-authored-by: yuneng-jiang <yuneng@berri.ai>
Co-authored-by: Mateo Wang <277851410+mateo-berri@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: alvinttang <alvin@pm.me>
Co-authored-by: Krrish Dholakia <krrish+github@berri.ai>
* streaming support in langfuse otel
* Added testing for Langfuse Otel tracing in the response API
---------
Co-authored-by: eycjur <eycjur@example.com>
