Files
litellm/tests/proxy_unit_tests/test_auth_checks.py
T
Sameer Kankute c7ab9adde5 Litellm oss staging 030626 (#29578)
* Fix incorrect agent API request example payload structure (#29556)

* fix(otel): add litellm_metadata fallback in _get_span_context and _end_proxy_span_from_kwargs (#29427)

* fix(otel): add litellm_metadata fallback in _get_span_context and _end_proxy_span_from_kwargs

On /v1/messages and other LITELLM_METADATA_ROUTES, the parent OTel span
is stored in litellm_params['litellm_metadata'] instead of
litellm_params['metadata']. When the request body contains a native
'metadata' field (e.g. Anthropic's {"user_id": "..."}),
litellm_params['metadata'] gets overwritten and the parent span is lost,
producing orphan root spans with a different trace_id.

Add fallback checks to litellm_metadata in:
- _get_span_context(): so child spans find the correct parent
- _end_proxy_span_from_kwargs(): so the proxy span gets closed

Fixes: https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm/issues/27934

* test(otel): tighten assertions per Greptile review

- test_span_context_metadata_takes_priority: assert litellm_metadata
  span is never accessed, proving metadata takes priority
- test_span_context_no_parent_when_neither_has_span: assert both ctx
  and detected_span are None

---------

Co-authored-by: shin-berri <shin-laptop@berri.ai>
Co-authored-by: yuneng-jiang <yuneng@berri.ai>
Co-authored-by: Aneesh-Fiddler <aneeshfiddler@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sameer Kankute <sameer@berri.ai>

* fix: remove premature end-user budget check from get_end_user_object (#29420)

* fix(proxy): remove premature end-user budget check from get_end_user_object

Problem:
- `_check_end_user_budget()` was called inside `get_end_user_object()`
- This caused budget checks to run BEFORE `skip_budget_checks` could be evaluated
- Zero-cost models (e.g., local vLLM) were incorrectly blocked when
  end-users exceeded their budget, even though they should bypass budget checks

Solution:
- Remove `_check_end_user_budget()` calls from `get_end_user_object()`
- Budget enforcement now happens exclusively in `common_checks()` where
  `skip_budget_checks` context is available
- `get_end_user_object()` keeps `route` as optional in function parameter for backwards compatibility and future implementation.

* refactor(tests): update budget enforcement tests to reflect changes in get_end_user_object

- test_get_end_user_object() verifies data fetching
- test_check_end_user_budget() verifies enforcement
- test_budget_enforcement_blocks_over_budget_users() integrates _check_end_user_budget()
- test_resolve_end_user_reraises_budget_exceeded() is now test_resolve_end_user since no budget exceeded is thrown in get_end_user_object()

* Gemini /images/generate and /images/edits billing fixes + add support for size and aspect ratio params (#29534)

* Fix Gemini image config mapping

* Address Gemini image config review

* Format Gemini image generation transform

* Fix Gemini image token usage logging

* Share Gemini image request helpers

* Fix Gemini Imagen model routing

* Fixes as per self code review

* Fixes per internal code review

* Stop gating Imagen imageSize forwarding

* Document Gemini image size mapping source

* chore: retrigger lint

* Clarify Gemini candidate count precedence

* Add Inception provider (#29522)

* add inception as provider (chat, fim)

* linting

* seperate test suite for chat and fim

* fix test coverage

* fix: model hub custom pricing model info (#29293)

* Opik user auth key metadata extractors (#28397)

* fix: enhance Opik metadata extraction to include user API key auth context fixed after refactoring to extractor logic

* test: add unit tests for OPik metadata extraction logic

* fix: enhance extract_opik_metadata function to prioritize metadata sources for improved accuracy

* fix(ci): clarified comments and edited unit tests

* test: add unit tests for OPik metadata extraction with auth and requester overrides

* fix(ui): replace fixed favicon.ico with current api get /get_favicon (#29532)

Signed-off-by: José Luis Di Biase <josx@interorganic.com.ar>

* fix(vertex/gemini): keep tool_call reference when a text-only assistant message follows (#29561)

`_gemini_convert_messages_with_history` tracks `last_message_with_tool_calls`
so a following tool result can be matched back to its tool call. The assignment
was inside a branch guarded by
`assistant_msg.get("tool_calls", []) is not None`, which is also True for a
text-only assistant message (an empty list is not None). As a result, an
assistant message with no tool calls that appears between a tool call and its
tool result overwrote the reference, and conversion failed with:

    Exception: Missing corresponding tool call for tool response message.

This shape is common: a model emits a short narration/assistant message after a
tool call before the tool result is appended.

Only update `last_message_with_tool_calls` when the assistant message actually
carries tool_calls (or a function_call). Adds a regression test.

Co-authored-by: shin-berri <shin-laptop@berri.ai>
Co-authored-by: yuneng-jiang <yuneng@berri.ai>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Add 1-hour cache write pricing for EU/AU/JP Bedrock Anthropic models (#28572)

* fix(thinking): handle None thinking param in is_thinking_enabled (#28598)

Squash-merged by litellm-agent from Terrajlz's PR.

* feat(helm): support tpl rendering in podAnnotations (#28609)

Squash-merged by litellm-agent from devauxbr's PR.

* Forward custom_llm_provider through the Responses API bridge (Fixes #28505) (#28575)

* Forward custom_llm_provider through the Responses API bridge (Fixes #28505)

When a Chat Completions request to a GPT-5.4+ model contains both
`tools` and `reasoning_effort`, `completion()` auto-routes through
`responses_api_bridge`. The bridge handler called
`litellm.responses()` / `litellm.aresponses()` without forwarding the
already-resolved `custom_llm_provider`, so the downstream call
re-invoked `get_llm_provider()` with `custom_llm_provider=None` and
stripped a second provider prefix from a `provider/provider/model`
deployment string.

For a deployment configured as `openai/openai/openai/gpt-5.5`,
the bridge flow sent `openai/gpt-5.5` to the upstream API instead of
the correct `openai/openai/gpt-5.5`. Upstream APIs that enforce
model-name allow-lists rejected this as `key_model_access_denied`.

Fix: pass the locally-resolved `custom_llm_provider` into both the
sync `responses()` and async `aresponses()` calls so the downstream
`_resolve_model_provider_for_responses` sees an explicit provider
and skips the second prefix-strip.

New regression test
`tests/test_litellm/completion_extras/test_responses_bridge_provider_propagation.py`
pins both call sites: each must forward `custom_llm_provider`.

* fix(28505): set custom_llm_provider on request_data instead of as duplicate kwarg

Greptile flagged that the previous patch passed custom_llm_provider as an
explicit kwarg to responses()/aresponses() while request_data already
carried it via the spread of sanitized_litellm_params, which would raise
TypeError: got multiple values for keyword argument on every real bridge
call.

Switches to assigning request_data['custom_llm_provider'] before the call
so the resolved provider wins over whatever sanitized_litellm_params spread
in, without duplicating the kwarg.

Updates the regression test to seed request_data with a sentinel
custom_llm_provider so it actually exercises the overwrite path (the
previous test mocked transform_request with a minimal dict and never hit
the conflict).

* chore: trigger shin-agent re-eval on retargeted staging base

* chore: trigger shin-agent re-eval against updated Greptile state

* Add 1-hour cache write pricing for EU/AU/JP Bedrock Anthropic models

The 1-hour prompt-cache write tier
(`cache_creation_input_token_cost_above_1hr`) was added to the
us./global. variants of the Claude 4.5/4.6/4.7 family on Bedrock, but
the eu./au./jp. cross-region inference profiles were left without it.
AWS Bedrock pricing applies the same +10% regional premium across all
geo profiles, so eu./au./jp. should carry the same 1-hour rates as
us. (1.6x the 5-minute regional rate).

Without these fields, cost tracking on EU/AU/JP Bedrock 1-hour-TTL
prompt caching falls back to the 5-minute write rate and undercounts
spend by ~60% for European, Australian, and Japanese tenants.

Adds the 1-hour tier (and Sonnet 4.5's long-context >200K tier where
AWS publishes one) to 14 regional Bedrock entries in both
`model_prices_and_context_window.json` and the bundled
`model_prices_and_context_window_backup.json`:

  - eu./au.   Opus 4.6     ($11.00 / MTok)
  - eu./au.   Opus 4.7     ($11.00 / MTok)
  - eu./au./jp. Sonnet 4.6 ($6.60 / MTok)
  - eu./au./jp. Sonnet 4.5 ($6.60 / MTok regular, $13.20 / MTok LC)
  - eu./au./jp. Haiku 4.5  ($2.20 / MTok)

Also extends `tests/test_litellm/test_bedrock_anthropic_1hr_cache_pricing.py`
with a `REGIONAL_EXPECTED` parametrized block covering all 13 new
entries plus the existing 1.6x ratio invariant.

Note: `eu.anthropic.claude-opus-4-5-20251101-v1:0` carries the
wrong 5m rate today (base 6.25e-06 instead of regional 6.875e-06),
which would break the 1.6x ratio check. It is intentionally left out
of this PR so the scope stays "1-hour cache tier addition" — a
separate follow-up should correct the EU 5m rates for Opus 4.5.

---------

Co-authored-by: Terrajlz <info@jouleselectrictech.com>
Co-authored-by: Bruno Devaux <devaux.br@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sameer Kankute <sameer@berri.ai>

* Add 1-hour cache write pricing tier for Vertex AI Anthropic models (#28569)

* fix(thinking): handle None thinking param in is_thinking_enabled (#28598)

Squash-merged by litellm-agent from Terrajlz's PR.

* feat(helm): support tpl rendering in podAnnotations (#28609)

Squash-merged by litellm-agent from devauxbr's PR.

* Forward custom_llm_provider through the Responses API bridge (Fixes #28505) (#28575)

* Forward custom_llm_provider through the Responses API bridge (Fixes #28505)

When a Chat Completions request to a GPT-5.4+ model contains both
`tools` and `reasoning_effort`, `completion()` auto-routes through
`responses_api_bridge`. The bridge handler called
`litellm.responses()` / `litellm.aresponses()` without forwarding the
already-resolved `custom_llm_provider`, so the downstream call
re-invoked `get_llm_provider()` with `custom_llm_provider=None` and
stripped a second provider prefix from a `provider/provider/model`
deployment string.

For a deployment configured as `openai/openai/openai/gpt-5.5`,
the bridge flow sent `openai/gpt-5.5` to the upstream API instead of
the correct `openai/openai/gpt-5.5`. Upstream APIs that enforce
model-name allow-lists rejected this as `key_model_access_denied`.

Fix: pass the locally-resolved `custom_llm_provider` into both the
sync `responses()` and async `aresponses()` calls so the downstream
`_resolve_model_provider_for_responses` sees an explicit provider
and skips the second prefix-strip.

New regression test
`tests/test_litellm/completion_extras/test_responses_bridge_provider_propagation.py`
pins both call sites: each must forward `custom_llm_provider`.

* fix(28505): set custom_llm_provider on request_data instead of as duplicate kwarg

Greptile flagged that the previous patch passed custom_llm_provider as an
explicit kwarg to responses()/aresponses() while request_data already
carried it via the spread of sanitized_litellm_params, which would raise
TypeError: got multiple values for keyword argument on every real bridge
call.

Switches to assigning request_data['custom_llm_provider'] before the call
so the resolved provider wins over whatever sanitized_litellm_params spread
in, without duplicating the kwarg.

Updates the regression test to seed request_data with a sentinel
custom_llm_provider so it actually exercises the overwrite path (the
previous test mocked transform_request with a minimal dict and never hit
the conflict).

* chore: trigger shin-agent re-eval on retargeted staging base

* chore: trigger shin-agent re-eval against updated Greptile state

* Add 1-hour cache write pricing tier for Vertex AI Anthropic models

GCP Vertex AI publishes a separate 1-hour cache write column for the
Claude family (1.6x the 5-minute write rate, matching the documented
Bedrock ratio). LiteLLM's Vertex AI Anthropic entries only carry the
5-minute tier, so any request that uses `cache_control: {"ttl": "1h"}`
on Vertex AI Claude is undercounted in cost tracking by ~60%.

The runtime side already supports the 1-hour tier — `VertexAIAnthropicConfig`
extends `AnthropicConfig`, populating `ephemeral_1h_input_tokens`, and
`_calculate_cache_creation_cost` reads `cache_creation_input_token_cost_above_1hr`.
Only the price registry was missing data.

Adds the field to 19 vertex_ai/claude-* entries across both
`model_prices_and_context_window.json` and the bundled
`model_prices_and_context_window_backup.json`:

  - Haiku 4.5 ($1.25 -> $2.00 / MTok)
  - Sonnet 3.7 / 4 / 4.5 / 4.6 ($3.75 -> $6.00 / MTok)
  - Opus 4.5 / 4.6 / 4.7 ($6.25 -> $10.00 / MTok)
  - Opus 4 / 4.1 ($18.75 -> $30.00 / MTok)

Adds `tests/test_litellm/test_vertex_anthropic_1hr_cache_pricing.py`
mirroring the Bedrock equivalent — pins each (5m, 1h) pair per model
and asserts the 1.6x ratio across the family.

Fixes #27781.

---------

Co-authored-by: Terrajlz <info@jouleselectrictech.com>
Co-authored-by: Bruno Devaux <devaux.br@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sameer Kankute <sameer@berri.ai>

* Fix Gemini multimodal function responses (#29325)

Co-authored-by: shin-berri <shin-laptop@berri.ai>
Co-authored-by: yuneng-jiang <yuneng@berri.ai>

* address greptile review: add _transform_image_usage method and model-map supports_image_size flag

- Add _transform_image_usage instance method to GoogleImageGenConfig that
  delegates to transform_gemini_image_usage, fixing the regression test
- Replace hardcoded "2.5-flash" string check in supports_gemini_image_size
  with a get_model_info lookup on supports_image_size (default true)
- Add supports_image_size: false to all gemini-2.5-flash model entries in
  model_prices_and_context_window.json so capability is controlled via the
  model map rather than embedded in code

* fix test failures: schema validation, mypy type, model info plumbing, pricing test

- Add supports_image_size to ModelInfoBase TypedDict so get_model_info surfaces it
- Pass supports_image_size through _get_model_info_helper constructor call
- Fix supports_gemini_image_size to use value is not False (None means unset, defaults to True)
- Add supports_image_size to JSON schema in test_aaamodel_prices_and_context_window_json_is_valid
- Correct gemini-3.1-flash-lite pricing assertions in test to match JSON values

* Add Azure AI Kimi K2.6 metadata (#27052)

* Add Azure AI Kimi K2.6 metadata

* Scope Kimi metadata test cost map setup

* fall back to substring check for models not in model_prices_and_context_window.json

Models like gemini-2.5-flash-image-preview are not in the pricing JSON,
so get_model_info raises. Fall back to "2.5-flash" not in model when the
JSON has no explicit supports_image_size entry for the model.

* fix(inception): don't forward global litellm.api_key to Inception FIM

Match the Inception chat config: resolve only an Inception-specific key
(param, litellm.inception_key, or INCEPTION_API_KEY) for the text-completion
FIM path. The global litellm.api_key (often an OpenAI key) was both leaking
to api.inceptionlabs.ai and taking precedence over the configured Inception
key when set.

* fix(auth): enforce end-user budget on custom-auth path that skips common_checks

get_end_user_object() no longer raises BudgetExceededError, so custom-auth
deployments with custom_auth_run_common_checks unset (which skip the
centralized common_checks gate) stopped enforcing the end-user budget,
letting an over-budget end user keep making requests. Re-enforce the
budget in _run_post_custom_auth_checks on that path.

---------

Signed-off-by: José Luis Di Biase <josx@interorganic.com.ar>
Co-authored-by: Isha <72744901+IshaMeera@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: aneeshsangvikar <aneeshsangvikar@fiddler.ai>
Co-authored-by: shin-berri <shin-laptop@berri.ai>
Co-authored-by: yuneng-jiang <yuneng@berri.ai>
Co-authored-by: Aneesh-Fiddler <aneeshfiddler@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Suleiman Elkhoury <108065141+suleimanelkhoury@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Dmitriy Alergant <93501479+DmitriyAlergant@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Yanis Miraoui <yanis.miraoui19@imperial.ac.uk>
Co-authored-by: Lovro Seder <vrovro@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Thomas Mildner <12685945+Thomas-Mildner@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: José Luis Di Biase <josx@interorganic.com.ar>
Co-authored-by: Lai Quang Huy <64073540+1qh@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Filippo Menghi <113345637+Cyberfilo@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Terrajlz <info@jouleselectrictech.com>
Co-authored-by: Bruno Devaux <devaux.br@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: ZHONG Ziwen <67355585+zzw-math@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Emerson Gomes <emerson.gomes@thalesgroup.com>
Co-authored-by: mateo-berri <277851410+mateo-berri@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-06-03 11:01:51 -07:00

1508 lines
48 KiB
Python

# What is this?
## Tests if 'get_end_user_object' works as expected
import sys, os, asyncio, time, random, uuid
import traceback
from dotenv import load_dotenv
load_dotenv()
import os
sys.path.insert(
0, os.path.abspath("../..")
) # Adds the parent directory to the system path
import pytest, litellm
import httpx
from litellm.proxy._types import UserAPIKeyAuth
from litellm.proxy.auth.auth_checks import get_end_user_object
from litellm.caching.caching import DualCache
from litellm.proxy.common_utils.user_api_key_cache import UserApiKeyCache
from litellm.proxy._types import (
LiteLLM_EndUserTable,
LiteLLM_BudgetTable,
LiteLLM_UserTable,
LiteLLM_TeamTable,
Litellm_EntityType,
)
from litellm.proxy.utils import PrismaClient
from litellm.proxy.auth.auth_checks import (
can_team_access_model,
_virtual_key_soft_budget_check,
_team_soft_budget_check,
)
from litellm.proxy.utils import ProxyLogging
from litellm.proxy.utils import CallInfo
@pytest.mark.parametrize("customer_spend, customer_budget", [(0, 10), (10, 0)])
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_get_end_user_object(customer_spend, customer_budget):
"""
Scenario 1: normal - get_end_user_object returns the cached user
Scenario 2: user over budget - NOTE: budget enforcement now happens in
common_checks() via _check_end_user_budget(), not in get_end_user_object()
This test verifies that get_end_user_object correctly retrieves the end user
from cache. Budget enforcement is tested separately in test_check_end_user_budget().
"""
end_user_id = "my-test-customer"
_budget = LiteLLM_BudgetTable(max_budget=customer_budget)
end_user_obj = LiteLLM_EndUserTable(
user_id=end_user_id,
spend=customer_spend,
litellm_budget_table=_budget,
blocked=False,
)
# UserApiKeyCache applies model_type on get/set; plain DualCache returns raw dicts
# and breaks get_end_user_object's typed async_get_cache path.
_cache = UserApiKeyCache()
_key = "end_user_id:{}".format(end_user_id)
await _cache.async_set_cache(
key=_key,
value=end_user_obj,
model_type=LiteLLM_EndUserTable,
)
# get_end_user_object only fetches data - it no longer enforces budget
# Budget enforcement happens in common_checks() via _check_end_user_budget()
result = await get_end_user_object(
end_user_id=end_user_id,
prisma_client="RANDOM VALUE", # type: ignore
user_api_key_cache=_cache,
route="/v1/chat/completions",
)
assert result is not None
assert result.user_id == end_user_id
@pytest.mark.parametrize("customer_spend, customer_budget", [(0, 10), (10, 0)])
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_check_end_user_budget(customer_spend, customer_budget):
"""
Test _check_end_user_budget enforcement:
- Scenario 1: customer_spend=0, customer_budget=10 - should pass (under budget)
- Scenario 2: customer_spend=10, customer_budget=0 - should fail (over budget)
Note: Budget enforcement for end users happens in common_checks() via
_check_end_user_budget(), not in get_end_user_object().
"""
from litellm.proxy.auth.auth_checks import _check_end_user_budget
_budget = LiteLLM_BudgetTable(max_budget=customer_budget)
end_user_obj = LiteLLM_EndUserTable(
user_id="my-test-customer",
spend=customer_spend,
litellm_budget_table=_budget,
blocked=False,
)
should_exceed = customer_spend > customer_budget
try:
await _check_end_user_budget(
end_user_obj=end_user_obj,
route="/v1/chat/completions",
)
if should_exceed:
pytest.fail(
"Expected BudgetExceededError. Customer Spend={}, Customer Budget={}".format(
customer_spend, customer_budget
)
)
except litellm.BudgetExceededError as e:
if not should_exceed:
pytest.fail(
"Unexpected BudgetExceededError. Customer Spend={}, Customer Budget={}, Error={}".format(
customer_spend, customer_budget, str(e)
)
)
# Verify the error has correct info
assert e.current_cost == customer_spend
assert e.max_budget == customer_budget
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
"model, expect_to_work",
[
("openai/gpt-4o-mini", True),
("openai/gpt-4o", False),
],
)
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_can_key_call_model(model, expect_to_work):
"""
If wildcard model + specific model is used, choose the specific model settings
"""
from litellm.proxy.auth.auth_checks import can_key_call_model
from fastapi import HTTPException
llm_model_list = [
{
"model_name": "openai/*",
"litellm_params": {
"model": "openai/*",
"api_key": "test-api-key",
},
"model_info": {
"id": "e6e7006f83029df40ebc02ddd068890253f4cd3092bcb203d3d8e6f6f606f30f",
"db_model": False,
"access_groups": ["public-openai-models"],
},
},
{
"model_name": "openai/gpt-4o",
"litellm_params": {
"model": "openai/gpt-4o",
"api_key": "test-api-key",
},
"model_info": {
"id": "0cfcd87f2cb12a783a466888d05c6c89df66db23e01cecd75ec0b83aed73c9ad",
"db_model": False,
"access_groups": ["private-openai-models"],
},
},
]
router = litellm.Router(model_list=llm_model_list)
args = {
"model": model,
"llm_model_list": llm_model_list,
"valid_token": UserAPIKeyAuth(
models=["public-openai-models"],
),
"llm_router": router,
}
if expect_to_work:
await can_key_call_model(**args)
else:
with pytest.raises(Exception) as e:
await can_key_call_model(**args)
print(e)
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
"model, expect_to_work",
[("openai/gpt-4o", False), ("openai/gpt-4o-mini", True)],
)
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_can_team_call_model(model, expect_to_work):
from litellm.proxy.auth.auth_checks import model_in_access_group
from fastapi import HTTPException
llm_model_list = [
{
"model_name": "openai/*",
"litellm_params": {
"model": "openai/*",
"api_key": "test-api-key",
},
"model_info": {
"id": "e6e7006f83029df40ebc02ddd068890253f4cd3092bcb203d3d8e6f6f606f30f",
"db_model": False,
"access_groups": ["public-openai-models"],
},
},
{
"model_name": "openai/gpt-4o",
"litellm_params": {
"model": "openai/gpt-4o",
"api_key": "test-api-key",
},
"model_info": {
"id": "0cfcd87f2cb12a783a466888d05c6c89df66db23e01cecd75ec0b83aed73c9ad",
"db_model": False,
"access_groups": ["private-openai-models"],
},
},
]
router = litellm.Router(model_list=llm_model_list)
args = {
"model": model,
"team_models": ["public-openai-models"],
"llm_router": router,
}
if expect_to_work:
assert model_in_access_group(**args)
else:
assert not model_in_access_group(**args)
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
"key_models, model, expect_to_work",
[
(["openai/*"], "openai/gpt-4o", True),
(["openai/*"], "openai/gpt-4o-mini", True),
(["openai/*"], "openaiz/gpt-4o-mini", False),
(["bedrock/*"], "bedrock/anthropic.claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620", True),
(["bedrock/*"], "bedrockz/anthropic.claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620", False),
(["bedrock/us.*"], "bedrock/us.amazon.nova-micro-v1:0", True),
],
)
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_can_key_call_model_wildcard_access(key_models, model, expect_to_work):
from litellm.proxy.auth.auth_checks import can_key_call_model
from fastapi import HTTPException
llm_model_list = [
{
"model_name": "openai/*",
"litellm_params": {
"model": "openai/*",
"api_key": "test-api-key",
},
"model_info": {
"id": "e6e7006f83029df40ebc02ddd068890253f4cd3092bcb203d3d8e6f6f606f30f",
"db_model": False,
},
},
{
"model_name": "bedrock/*",
"litellm_params": {
"model": "bedrock/*",
"api_key": "test-api-key",
},
"model_info": {
"id": "e6e7006f83029df40ebc02ddd068890253f4cd3092bcb203d3d8e6f6f606f30f",
"db_model": False,
},
},
{
"model_name": "openai/gpt-4o",
"litellm_params": {
"model": "openai/gpt-4o",
"api_key": "test-api-key",
},
"model_info": {
"id": "0cfcd87f2cb12a783a466888d05c6c89df66db23e01cecd75ec0b83aed73c9ad",
"db_model": False,
},
},
]
router = litellm.Router(model_list=llm_model_list)
user_api_key_object = UserAPIKeyAuth(
models=key_models,
)
if expect_to_work:
await can_key_call_model(
model=model,
llm_model_list=llm_model_list,
valid_token=user_api_key_object,
llm_router=router,
)
else:
with pytest.raises(Exception) as e:
await can_key_call_model(
model=model,
llm_model_list=llm_model_list,
valid_token=user_api_key_object,
llm_router=router,
)
print(e)
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
"key_models, model, expect_to_work",
[
# After a cost-map reload, add_known_models() updates anthropic_models so
# the anthropic/* wildcard can match a newly-added Anthropic model.
(["anthropic/*"], "claude-brand-new-model-reload-test", True),
# Wrong provider wildcard must still be denied even after reload.
(["openai/*"], "claude-brand-new-model-reload-test", False),
],
)
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_wildcard_access_after_cost_map_reload(key_models, model, expect_to_work):
"""
Regression test: after a cost-map hot-reload, calling
add_known_models(model_cost_map=new_map) must update litellm.anthropic_models
so that the anthropic/* wildcard correctly grants (or denies) access to
newly-added models.
Root cause: both reload paths in proxy_server.py only updated
litellm.model_cost but never re-ran add_known_models(), so the provider sets
stayed stale and wildcard matching failed for new models.
Fix: each reload now calls litellm.add_known_models(model_cost_map=new_map)
with the fetched map passed explicitly to avoid any reference ambiguity.
"""
from litellm.proxy.auth.auth_checks import can_key_call_model
# Build a new cost map that includes the brand-new model — exactly what
# proxy_server.py receives from get_model_cost_map() during a reload.
new_cost_map = dict(litellm.model_cost)
new_cost_map[model] = {
"litellm_provider": "anthropic",
"max_tokens": 8192,
"input_cost_per_token": 0.000003,
"output_cost_per_token": 0.000015,
}
original_model_cost = litellm.model_cost
litellm.model_cost = new_cost_map
# Confirm the model is NOT yet in the provider set before reload propagation.
assert model not in litellm.anthropic_models
# Simulate what proxy_server.py now does after every reload.
litellm.add_known_models(model_cost_map=new_cost_map)
# After add_known_models(), the model must be in the set.
assert model in litellm.anthropic_models
llm_model_list = [
{
"model_name": "anthropic/*",
"litellm_params": {"model": "anthropic/*", "api_key": "test-api-key"},
"model_info": {"id": "test-id-anthropic-wildcard", "db_model": False},
},
{
"model_name": "openai/*",
"litellm_params": {"model": "openai/*", "api_key": "test-api-key"},
"model_info": {"id": "test-id-openai-wildcard", "db_model": False},
},
]
router = litellm.Router(model_list=llm_model_list)
user_api_key_object = UserAPIKeyAuth(models=key_models)
try:
if expect_to_work:
await can_key_call_model(
model=model,
llm_model_list=llm_model_list,
valid_token=user_api_key_object,
llm_router=router,
)
else:
with pytest.raises(Exception):
await can_key_call_model(
model=model,
llm_model_list=llm_model_list,
valid_token=user_api_key_object,
llm_router=router,
)
finally:
litellm.model_cost = original_model_cost
litellm.anthropic_models.discard(model)
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_add_known_models_explicit_map_updates_provider_sets():
"""
Regression test: after a cost-map hot-reload, calling
add_known_models(model_cost_map=new_map) with the new map passed explicitly
must add any new provider models to the correct provider sets so that
wildcard access checks (anthropic/*, openai/*, …) work immediately.
This covers the proxy_server.py fix where both reload paths now call
litellm.add_known_models(model_cost_map=new_model_cost_map) instead of
relying on the module-level model_cost being up to date.
"""
fake_new_model = "claude-brand-new-explicit-map-test"
# Baseline: the model must not be in the sets before we do anything.
assert fake_new_model not in litellm.anthropic_models
new_cost_map = dict(litellm.model_cost)
new_cost_map[fake_new_model] = {
"litellm_provider": "anthropic",
"max_tokens": 8192,
"input_cost_per_token": 0.000003,
"output_cost_per_token": 0.000015,
}
# Simulate what proxy_server.py does on reload.
original_model_cost = litellm.model_cost
litellm.model_cost = new_cost_map
litellm.add_known_models(model_cost_map=new_cost_map)
try:
assert fake_new_model in litellm.anthropic_models, (
"add_known_models(model_cost_map=...) did not add the new model to "
"litellm.anthropic_models — wildcard access checks would fail."
)
finally:
# Clean up: restore original state.
litellm.model_cost = original_model_cost
litellm.anthropic_models.discard(fake_new_model)
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_is_valid_fallback_model():
from litellm.proxy.auth.auth_checks import is_valid_fallback_model
from litellm import Router
router = Router(
model_list=[
{
"model_name": "gpt-3.5-turbo",
"litellm_params": {"model": "openai/gpt-3.5-turbo"},
}
]
)
try:
await is_valid_fallback_model(
model="gpt-3.5-turbo", llm_router=router, user_model=None
)
except Exception as e:
pytest.fail(f"Expected is_valid_fallback_model to work, got exception: {e}")
try:
await is_valid_fallback_model(
model="gpt-4o", llm_router=router, user_model=None
)
pytest.fail("Expected is_valid_fallback_model to fail")
except Exception as e:
assert "Invalid" in str(e)
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
"token_spend, max_budget, expect_budget_error",
[
(5.0, 10.0, False), # Under budget
(10.0, 10.0, True), # At budget limit
(15.0, 10.0, True), # Over budget
],
)
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_virtual_key_max_budget_check(
token_spend, max_budget, expect_budget_error
):
"""
Test if virtual key budget checks work as expected:
1. Triggers budget alert for all cases
2. Raises BudgetExceededError when spend >= max_budget
"""
from litellm.proxy.auth.auth_checks import _virtual_key_max_budget_check
from litellm.proxy.utils import ProxyLogging
# Setup test data
valid_token = UserAPIKeyAuth(
token="test-token",
spend=token_spend,
max_budget=max_budget,
user_id="test-user",
key_alias="test-key",
)
user_obj = LiteLLM_UserTable(
user_id="test-user",
user_email="test@email.com",
max_budget=None,
)
proxy_logging_obj = ProxyLogging(
user_api_key_cache=None,
)
# Track if budget alert was called
alert_called = False
async def mock_budget_alert(*args, **kwargs):
nonlocal alert_called
alert_called = True
proxy_logging_obj.budget_alerts = mock_budget_alert
try:
await _virtual_key_max_budget_check(
valid_token=valid_token,
proxy_logging_obj=proxy_logging_obj,
user_obj=user_obj,
)
if expect_budget_error:
pytest.fail(
f"Expected BudgetExceededError for spend={token_spend}, max_budget={max_budget}"
)
except litellm.BudgetExceededError as e:
if not expect_budget_error:
pytest.fail(
f"Unexpected BudgetExceededError for spend={token_spend}, max_budget={max_budget}"
)
assert e.current_cost == token_spend
assert e.max_budget == max_budget
await asyncio.sleep(1)
# Verify budget alert was triggered
assert alert_called, "Budget alert should be triggered"
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
"model, team_models, expect_to_work",
[
("gpt-4", ["gpt-4"], True), # exact match
("gpt-4", ["all-proxy-models"], True), # all-proxy-models access
("gpt-4", ["*"], True), # wildcard access
("gpt-4", ["openai/*"], True), # openai wildcard access
(
"bedrock/anthropic.claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620",
["bedrock/*"],
True,
), # wildcard access
(
"bedrockz/anthropic.claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620",
["bedrock/*"],
False,
), # non-match wildcard access
("bedrock/very_new_model", ["bedrock/*"], True), # bedrock wildcard access
(
"bedrock/claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620",
["bedrock/claude-*"],
True,
), # match on pattern
(
"bedrock/claude-3-6-sonnet-20240620",
["bedrock/claude-3-5-*"],
False,
), # don't match on pattern
("openai/gpt-4o", ["openai/*"], True), # openai wildcard access
("gpt-4", ["gpt-3.5-turbo"], False), # model not in allowed list
("claude-3", [], True), # empty model list (allows all)
],
)
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_can_team_access_model(model, team_models, expect_to_work):
"""
Test cases for can_team_access_model:
1. Exact model match
2. all-proxy-models access
3. Wildcard (*) access
4. OpenAI wildcard access
5. Model not in allowed list
6. Empty model list
7. None model list
"""
try:
team_object = LiteLLM_TeamTable(
team_id="test-team",
models=team_models,
)
result = await can_team_access_model(
model=model,
team_object=team_object,
llm_router=None,
team_model_aliases=None,
)
if not expect_to_work:
pytest.fail(
f"Expected model access check to fail for model={model}, team_models={team_models}"
)
except Exception as e:
if expect_to_work:
pytest.fail(
f"Expected model access check to work for model={model}, team_models={team_models}. Got error: {str(e)}"
)
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
"spend, soft_budget, expect_alert",
[
(100, 50, True), # Over soft budget
(50, 50, True), # At soft budget
(25, 50, False), # Under soft budget
(100, None, False), # No soft budget set
],
)
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_virtual_key_soft_budget_check(spend, soft_budget, expect_alert):
"""
Test cases for _virtual_key_soft_budget_check:
1. Spend over soft budget
2. Spend at soft budget
3. Spend under soft budget
4. No soft budget set
"""
alert_triggered = False
class MockProxyLogging:
async def budget_alerts(self, type, user_info):
nonlocal alert_triggered
alert_triggered = True
assert type == "soft_budget"
assert isinstance(user_info, CallInfo)
valid_token = UserAPIKeyAuth(
token="test-token",
spend=spend,
soft_budget=soft_budget,
user_id="test-user",
team_id="test-team",
key_alias="test-key",
)
proxy_logging_obj = MockProxyLogging()
await _virtual_key_soft_budget_check(
valid_token=valid_token,
proxy_logging_obj=proxy_logging_obj,
)
await asyncio.sleep(0.1) # Allow time for the alert task to complete
assert (
alert_triggered == expect_alert
), f"Expected alert_triggered to be {expect_alert} for spend={spend}, soft_budget={soft_budget}"
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
"spend, soft_budget, expect_alert, metadata, expected_alert_emails",
[
(
100,
50,
False,
None,
None,
), # Over soft budget, no metadata - no alert_emails configured, so no alert
(
50,
50,
False,
None,
None,
), # At soft budget, no metadata - no alert_emails configured, so no alert
(25, 50, False, None, None), # Under soft budget
(100, None, False, None, None), # No soft budget set
(
100,
50,
True,
{"soft_budget_alerting_emails": ["team1@example.com", "team2@example.com"]},
["team1@example.com", "team2@example.com"],
), # Over soft budget with list of emails
(
100,
50,
True,
{"soft_budget_alerting_emails": "team1@example.com,team2@example.com"},
["team1@example.com", "team2@example.com"],
), # Over soft budget with comma-separated emails
(
100,
50,
True,
{
"soft_budget_alerting_emails": [
"team1@example.com",
"",
" ",
"team2@example.com",
]
},
["team1@example.com", "team2@example.com"],
), # Over soft budget with empty strings filtered
],
)
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_team_soft_budget_check(
spend, soft_budget, expect_alert, metadata, expected_alert_emails
):
"""
Test cases for _team_soft_budget_check:
1. Spend over soft budget, no alert_emails configured - should NOT trigger alert (alerts only sent when alert_emails configured)
2. Spend at soft budget, no alert_emails configured - should NOT trigger alert (alerts only sent when alert_emails configured)
3. Spend under soft budget - should not trigger alert
4. No soft budget set - should not trigger alert
5. Team with alert emails in metadata (list) - should include alert_emails in CallInfo
6. Team with alert emails in metadata (comma-separated string) - should parse and include alert_emails
7. Team with alert emails containing empty strings - should filter them out
"""
alert_triggered = False
captured_call_info = None
class MockProxyLogging:
async def budget_alerts(self, type, user_info):
nonlocal alert_triggered, captured_call_info
alert_triggered = True
captured_call_info = user_info
assert type == "soft_budget"
assert isinstance(user_info, CallInfo)
valid_token = UserAPIKeyAuth(
token="test-token",
user_id="test-user",
team_id="test-team",
team_alias="test-team-alias",
key_alias="test-key",
)
team_object = LiteLLM_TeamTable(
team_id="test-team",
spend=spend,
soft_budget=soft_budget,
max_budget=100.0,
metadata=metadata,
)
proxy_logging_obj = MockProxyLogging()
await _team_soft_budget_check(
team_object=team_object,
valid_token=valid_token,
proxy_logging_obj=proxy_logging_obj,
)
await asyncio.sleep(0.1) # Allow time for the alert task to complete
assert (
alert_triggered == expect_alert
), f"Expected alert_triggered to be {expect_alert} for spend={spend}, soft_budget={soft_budget}"
if expect_alert:
assert captured_call_info is not None
assert captured_call_info.team_id == "test-team"
assert captured_call_info.spend == spend
assert captured_call_info.soft_budget == soft_budget
assert captured_call_info.event_group == Litellm_EntityType.TEAM
# Verify alert_emails if expected
if expected_alert_emails is not None:
assert captured_call_info.alert_emails == expected_alert_emails
else:
assert (
captured_call_info.alert_emails is None
or captured_call_info.alert_emails == []
)
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_can_user_call_model():
from litellm.proxy.auth.auth_checks import can_user_call_model
from litellm.proxy._types import ProxyException
from litellm import Router
router = Router(
model_list=[
{
"model_name": "anthropic-claude",
"litellm_params": {"model": "anthropic/anthropic-claude"},
},
{
"model_name": "gpt-3.5-turbo",
"litellm_params": {"model": "gpt-3.5-turbo", "api_key": "test-api-key"},
},
]
)
args = {
"model": "anthropic-claude",
"llm_router": router,
"user_object": LiteLLM_UserTable(
user_id="testuser21@mycompany.com",
max_budget=None,
spend=0.0042295,
model_max_budget={},
model_spend={},
user_email="testuser@mycompany.com",
models=["gpt-3.5-turbo"],
),
}
with pytest.raises(ProxyException) as e:
await can_user_call_model(**args)
args["model"] = "gpt-3.5-turbo"
await can_user_call_model(**args)
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_can_user_call_model_with_no_default_models():
from litellm.proxy.auth.auth_checks import can_user_call_model
from litellm.proxy._types import ProxyException, SpecialModelNames
from unittest.mock import MagicMock
args = {
"model": "anthropic-claude",
"llm_router": MagicMock(),
"user_object": LiteLLM_UserTable(
user_id="testuser21@mycompany.com",
max_budget=None,
spend=0.0042295,
model_max_budget={},
model_spend={},
user_email="testuser@mycompany.com",
models=[SpecialModelNames.no_default_models.value],
),
}
with pytest.raises(ProxyException) as e:
await can_user_call_model(**args)
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_get_fuzzy_user_object():
from litellm.proxy.auth.auth_checks import _get_fuzzy_user_object
from litellm.proxy.utils import PrismaClient
from unittest.mock import AsyncMock, MagicMock
# Setup mock Prisma client
mock_prisma = MagicMock()
mock_prisma.db = MagicMock()
mock_prisma.db.litellm_usertable = MagicMock()
# Mock user data
test_user = LiteLLM_UserTable(
user_id="test_123",
sso_user_id="sso_123",
user_email="test@example.com",
organization_memberships=[],
max_budget=None,
)
# Test 1: Find user by SSO ID
mock_prisma.db.litellm_usertable.find_unique = AsyncMock(return_value=test_user)
result = await _get_fuzzy_user_object(
prisma_client=mock_prisma, sso_user_id="sso_123", user_email="test@example.com"
)
assert result == test_user
mock_prisma.db.litellm_usertable.find_unique.assert_called_with(
where={"sso_user_id": "sso_123"}, include={"organization_memberships": True}
)
# Test 2: SSO ID not found, find by email
mock_prisma.db.litellm_usertable.find_unique = AsyncMock(return_value=None)
mock_prisma.db.litellm_usertable.find_first = AsyncMock(return_value=test_user)
mock_prisma.db.litellm_usertable.update = AsyncMock()
result = await _get_fuzzy_user_object(
prisma_client=mock_prisma,
sso_user_id="new_sso_456",
user_email="test@example.com",
)
assert result == test_user
mock_prisma.db.litellm_usertable.find_first.assert_called_with(
where={"user_email": {"equals": "test@example.com", "mode": "insensitive"}},
include={"organization_memberships": True},
)
# Test 3: Verify background SSO update task when user found by email
await asyncio.sleep(0.1) # Allow time for background task
mock_prisma.db.litellm_usertable.update.assert_called_with(
where={"user_id": "test_123"}, data={"sso_user_id": "new_sso_456"}
)
# Test 4: User not found by either method
mock_prisma.db.litellm_usertable.find_unique = AsyncMock(return_value=None)
mock_prisma.db.litellm_usertable.find_first = AsyncMock(return_value=None)
result = await _get_fuzzy_user_object(
prisma_client=mock_prisma,
sso_user_id="unknown_sso",
user_email="unknown@example.com",
)
assert result is None
# Test 5: Only email provided (no SSO ID)
mock_prisma.db.litellm_usertable.find_first = AsyncMock(return_value=test_user)
result = await _get_fuzzy_user_object(
prisma_client=mock_prisma, user_email="test@example.com"
)
assert result == test_user
mock_prisma.db.litellm_usertable.find_first.assert_called_with(
where={"user_email": {"equals": "test@example.com", "mode": "insensitive"}},
include={"organization_memberships": True},
)
# Test 6: Only SSO ID provided (no email)
mock_prisma.db.litellm_usertable.find_unique = AsyncMock(return_value=test_user)
result = await _get_fuzzy_user_object(
prisma_client=mock_prisma, sso_user_id="sso_123"
)
assert result == test_user
mock_prisma.db.litellm_usertable.find_unique.assert_called_with(
where={"sso_user_id": "sso_123"}, include={"organization_memberships": True}
)
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
"model, alias_map, expect_to_work",
[
("gpt-4", {"gpt-4": "gpt-4-team1"}, True), # model matches alias value
("gpt-5", {"gpt-4": "gpt-4-team1"}, False),
],
)
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_can_key_call_model_with_aliases(model, alias_map, expect_to_work):
"""
Test if can_key_call_model correctly handles model aliases in the token
"""
from litellm.proxy.auth.auth_checks import can_key_call_model
llm_model_list = [
{
"model_name": "gpt-4-team1",
"litellm_params": {
"model": "gpt-4",
"api_key": "test-api-key",
},
}
]
router = litellm.Router(model_list=llm_model_list)
user_api_key_object = UserAPIKeyAuth(
models=[
"gpt-4-team1",
],
team_model_aliases=alias_map,
)
if expect_to_work:
await can_key_call_model(
model=model,
llm_model_list=llm_model_list,
valid_token=user_api_key_object,
llm_router=router,
)
else:
with pytest.raises(Exception) as e:
await can_key_call_model(
model=model,
llm_model_list=llm_model_list,
valid_token=user_api_key_object,
llm_router=router,
)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Access group cache helpers (_cache_access_object, _delete_cache_access_object)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_cache_access_object():
"""Test _cache_access_object stores access group in cache with correct key."""
from litellm.proxy.auth.auth_checks import _cache_access_object
from litellm.proxy._types import LiteLLM_AccessGroupTable
cache = DualCache()
ag_id = "ag-test-123"
ag_table = LiteLLM_AccessGroupTable(
access_group_id=ag_id,
access_group_name="test-group",
access_model_names=["gpt-4"],
)
await _cache_access_object(
access_group_id=ag_id,
access_group_table=ag_table,
user_api_key_cache=cache,
)
cached = await cache.async_get_cache(key=f"access_group_id:{ag_id}")
assert cached is not None
if isinstance(cached, dict):
assert cached.get("access_group_id") == ag_id
assert cached.get("access_group_name") == "test-group"
else:
assert cached.access_group_id == ag_id
assert cached.access_group_name == "test-group"
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_delete_cache_access_object():
"""Test _delete_cache_access_object removes access group from in-memory cache."""
from litellm.proxy.auth.auth_checks import _delete_cache_access_object
from litellm.proxy._types import LiteLLM_AccessGroupTable
cache = DualCache()
ag_id = "ag-delete-test"
ag_table = LiteLLM_AccessGroupTable(
access_group_id=ag_id,
access_group_name="to-delete",
)
await cache.async_set_cache(key=f"access_group_id:{ag_id}", value=ag_table, ttl=60)
await _delete_cache_access_object(access_group_id=ag_id, user_api_key_cache=cache)
cached = await cache.async_get_cache(key=f"access_group_id:{ag_id}")
assert cached is None
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Access group resource fetchers (_get_models_from_access_groups, _get_agent_ids_from_access_groups)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
"resource_field, access_group_data, expected",
[
(
"access_model_names",
{"access_group_id": "ag-1", "access_model_names": ["gpt-4", "claude-3"]},
["gpt-4", "claude-3"],
),
(
"access_agent_ids",
{"access_group_id": "ag-2", "access_agent_ids": ["agent-a", "agent-b"]},
["agent-a", "agent-b"],
),
(
"access_model_names",
{"access_group_id": "ag-3", "access_model_names": []},
[],
),
],
)
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_get_resources_from_access_groups(
resource_field, access_group_data, expected
):
"""Test _get_resources_from_access_groups returns correct resource list from access groups."""
from unittest.mock import AsyncMock, MagicMock, patch
from litellm.proxy._types import LiteLLM_AccessGroupTable
from litellm.proxy.auth.auth_checks import (
_get_agent_ids_from_access_groups,
_get_models_from_access_groups,
)
ag_table = LiteLLM_AccessGroupTable(
access_group_id=access_group_data["access_group_id"],
access_group_name="test",
access_model_names=access_group_data.get("access_model_names", []),
access_agent_ids=access_group_data.get("access_agent_ids", []),
)
with patch(
"litellm.proxy.auth.auth_checks.get_access_object",
new_callable=AsyncMock,
return_value=ag_table,
):
if resource_field == "access_model_names":
result = await _get_models_from_access_groups(
access_group_ids=[access_group_data["access_group_id"]],
prisma_client=MagicMock(),
user_api_key_cache=DualCache(),
)
else:
result = await _get_agent_ids_from_access_groups(
access_group_ids=[access_group_data["access_group_id"]],
prisma_client=MagicMock(),
user_api_key_cache=DualCache(),
)
assert sorted(result) == sorted(expected)
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_get_models_from_access_groups_empty_ids():
"""Test _get_models_from_access_groups returns empty list when access_group_ids is empty."""
from litellm.proxy.auth.auth_checks import _get_models_from_access_groups
result = await _get_models_from_access_groups(access_group_ids=[])
assert result == []
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# can_team_access_model with access_group_ids fallback
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_can_team_access_model_via_access_group_ids():
"""Test can_team_access_model allows access when team has access_group_ids granting model access."""
from unittest.mock import AsyncMock, patch
from litellm.proxy.auth.auth_checks import can_team_access_model
team_object = LiteLLM_TeamTable(
team_id="test-team",
models=[],
access_group_ids=["ag-with-gpt4"],
)
with patch(
"litellm.proxy.auth.auth_checks._get_models_from_access_groups",
new_callable=AsyncMock,
return_value=["gpt-4"],
):
result = await can_team_access_model(
model="gpt-4",
team_object=team_object,
llm_router=None,
team_model_aliases=None,
)
assert result is True
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_can_team_access_model_access_group_ids_denied():
"""Test can_team_access_model denies when neither team models nor access_group_ids grant access."""
from unittest.mock import AsyncMock, patch
from litellm.proxy.auth.auth_checks import can_team_access_model
from litellm.proxy._types import ProxyException
team_object = LiteLLM_TeamTable(
team_id="test-team",
models=["gpt-3.5-turbo"],
access_group_ids=["ag-other"],
)
with patch(
"litellm.proxy.auth.auth_checks._get_models_from_access_groups",
new_callable=AsyncMock,
return_value=["claude-3"],
):
with pytest.raises(ProxyException):
await can_team_access_model(
model="gpt-4",
team_object=team_object,
llm_router=None,
team_model_aliases=None,
)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# can_key_call_model with access_group_ids fallback
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_can_key_call_model_via_access_group_ids():
"""Test can_key_call_model allows access when key has access_group_ids granting model access."""
from unittest.mock import AsyncMock, patch
from litellm.proxy.auth.auth_checks import can_key_call_model
user_api_key_object = UserAPIKeyAuth(
token="test-token",
models=[],
access_group_ids=["ag-with-gpt4"],
)
router = litellm.Router(
model_list=[
{
"model_name": "gpt-4",
"litellm_params": {"model": "openai/gpt-4", "api_key": "test"},
}
]
)
with patch(
"litellm.proxy.auth.auth_checks._get_models_from_access_groups",
new_callable=AsyncMock,
return_value=["gpt-4"],
):
await can_key_call_model(
model="gpt-4",
llm_model_list=[],
valid_token=user_api_key_object,
llm_router=router,
)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# _key_access_group_grants_model (key access group overriding team restriction)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def _patch_proxy_server_globals():
"""Patch proxy_server's prisma_client and user_api_key_cache to non-None mocks
so the helper's None-guard doesn't short-circuit. The actual values don't
matter because get_access_object is patched separately to return fixtures."""
from unittest.mock import MagicMock, patch
return [
patch("litellm.proxy.proxy_server.prisma_client", MagicMock()),
patch("litellm.proxy.proxy_server.user_api_key_cache", MagicMock()),
patch("litellm.proxy.proxy_server.proxy_logging_obj", MagicMock()),
]
def _fake_access_group(
access_group_id: str,
access_model_names=None,
assigned_team_ids=None,
assigned_key_ids=None,
):
from litellm.proxy._types import LiteLLM_AccessGroupTable
return LiteLLM_AccessGroupTable(
access_group_id=access_group_id,
access_group_name=access_group_id,
access_model_names=access_model_names or [],
assigned_team_ids=assigned_team_ids or [],
assigned_key_ids=assigned_key_ids or [],
)
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_key_access_group_grants_model_when_team_authorized():
"""Group's assigned_team_ids includes the key's team and grants the model → True.
This is the happy path equivalent of Andres's report: admin creates an
access group with assigned_team_ids=[team-a], grants claude-haiku-4-5,
attaches it to a key on team-a. Override fires.
"""
from unittest.mock import AsyncMock, patch
from litellm.proxy.auth.auth_checks import _key_access_group_grants_model
valid_token = UserAPIKeyAuth(
token="test-token",
models=[],
access_group_ids=["premium-group"],
team_id="team-a",
)
team_object = LiteLLM_TeamTable(
team_id="team-a",
models=["mock-success"],
access_group_ids=[], # deliberately not synced — the access group itself authorizes
)
fake_ag = _fake_access_group(
access_group_id="premium-group",
access_model_names=["claude-haiku-4-5"],
assigned_team_ids=["team-a"],
)
patches = _patch_proxy_server_globals() + [
patch(
"litellm.proxy.auth.auth_checks.get_access_object",
new_callable=AsyncMock,
return_value=fake_ag,
),
]
for p in patches:
p.start()
try:
assert (
await _key_access_group_grants_model(
model="claude-haiku-4-5",
valid_token=valid_token,
team_object=team_object,
llm_router=None,
)
is True
)
finally:
for p in patches:
p.stop()
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_key_access_group_grants_model_when_key_directly_authorized():
"""Group's assigned_key_ids includes the key's token and grants the model → True.
Per-key authorization path: an admin scopes a group directly to a key
(assigned_key_ids) without listing the team.
"""
from unittest.mock import AsyncMock, patch
from litellm.proxy.auth.auth_checks import _key_access_group_grants_model
valid_token = UserAPIKeyAuth(
token="test-token-hashed",
models=[],
access_group_ids=["per-key-group"],
team_id="team-a",
)
team_object = LiteLLM_TeamTable(
team_id="team-a",
models=["mock-success"],
access_group_ids=[],
)
fake_ag = _fake_access_group(
access_group_id="per-key-group",
access_model_names=["claude-haiku-4-5"],
assigned_team_ids=[],
assigned_key_ids=["test-token-hashed"],
)
patches = _patch_proxy_server_globals() + [
patch(
"litellm.proxy.auth.auth_checks.get_access_object",
new_callable=AsyncMock,
return_value=fake_ag,
),
]
for p in patches:
p.start()
try:
assert (
await _key_access_group_grants_model(
model="claude-haiku-4-5",
valid_token=valid_token,
team_object=team_object,
llm_router=None,
)
is True
)
finally:
for p in patches:
p.stop()
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_key_access_group_grants_model_when_key_has_no_groups():
"""Key with no access_group_ids → False (early return, no DB read)."""
from litellm.proxy.auth.auth_checks import _key_access_group_grants_model
valid_token = UserAPIKeyAuth(
token="test-token",
models=[],
access_group_ids=[],
team_id="team-a",
)
team_object = LiteLLM_TeamTable(
team_id="team-a",
models=["mock-success"],
access_group_ids=["any-group"],
)
assert (
await _key_access_group_grants_model(
model="claude-haiku-4-5",
valid_token=valid_token,
team_object=team_object,
llm_router=None,
)
is False
)
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_key_access_group_grants_model_when_group_does_not_cover_model():
"""Group authorizes the team but does not grant the requested model → False."""
from unittest.mock import AsyncMock, patch
from litellm.proxy.auth.auth_checks import _key_access_group_grants_model
valid_token = UserAPIKeyAuth(
token="test-token",
models=[],
access_group_ids=["basic-group"],
team_id="team-a",
)
team_object = LiteLLM_TeamTable(
team_id="team-a",
models=["mock-success"],
access_group_ids=[],
)
fake_ag = _fake_access_group(
access_group_id="basic-group",
access_model_names=["gpt-4o-mini"],
assigned_team_ids=["team-a"],
)
patches = _patch_proxy_server_globals() + [
patch(
"litellm.proxy.auth.auth_checks.get_access_object",
new_callable=AsyncMock,
return_value=fake_ag,
),
]
for p in patches:
p.start()
try:
assert (
await _key_access_group_grants_model(
model="claude-haiku-4-5",
valid_token=valid_token,
team_object=team_object,
llm_router=None,
)
is False
)
finally:
for p in patches:
p.stop()
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_key_access_group_grants_model_when_group_authorizes_neither():
"""
Bypass regression test: a team member sets a foreign access group on their
key. The group grants the requested model but its assigned_team_ids /
assigned_key_ids do not include this caller's team or token. Override is
denied — the team's 401 propagates.
"""
from unittest.mock import AsyncMock, patch
from litellm.proxy.auth.auth_checks import _key_access_group_grants_model
valid_token = UserAPIKeyAuth(
token="team-a-token",
models=[],
access_group_ids=["team-b-premium"],
team_id="team-a",
)
team_object = LiteLLM_TeamTable(
team_id="team-a",
models=["mock-success"],
access_group_ids=[],
)
fake_ag = _fake_access_group(
access_group_id="team-b-premium",
access_model_names=["claude-opus-4-5"],
assigned_team_ids=["team-b"],
assigned_key_ids=["team-b-token"],
)
patches = _patch_proxy_server_globals() + [
patch(
"litellm.proxy.auth.auth_checks.get_access_object",
new_callable=AsyncMock,
return_value=fake_ag,
),
]
for p in patches:
p.start()
try:
assert (
await _key_access_group_grants_model(
model="claude-opus-4-5",
valid_token=valid_token,
team_object=team_object,
llm_router=None,
)
is False
)
finally:
for p in patches:
p.stop()
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_key_access_group_grants_model_when_get_access_object_raises():
"""Group lookup failure (404, network, etc.) is treated as no authorization."""
from unittest.mock import AsyncMock, patch
from litellm.proxy.auth.auth_checks import _key_access_group_grants_model
valid_token = UserAPIKeyAuth(
token="test-token",
models=[],
access_group_ids=["missing-group"],
team_id="team-a",
)
team_object = LiteLLM_TeamTable(
team_id="team-a",
models=["mock-success"],
access_group_ids=[],
)
patches = _patch_proxy_server_globals() + [
patch(
"litellm.proxy.auth.auth_checks.get_access_object",
new_callable=AsyncMock,
side_effect=Exception("not found"),
),
]
for p in patches:
p.start()
try:
assert (
await _key_access_group_grants_model(
model="claude-haiku-4-5",
valid_token=valid_token,
team_object=team_object,
llm_router=None,
)
is False
)
finally:
for p in patches:
p.stop()