mirror of
https://github.com/tiennm99/litellm.git
synced 2026-07-21 08:20:44 +00:00
* fix(jwt-auth): defer to single-team DB fallback on claim mismatch Extends the single-team DB fallback introduced in #26418 to two more cases where it previously could not run: * `find_and_validate_specific_team_id`: when `team_id_jwt_field` is configured and a claim value is present in the token but the team does not exist in the LiteLLM DB (HTTPException 404 from `get_team_object`), return `(None, None)` instead of raising — the auth_builder fallback then attributes the request to the user's single DB team. Only HTTPException is caught; other errors (e.g. "No DB Connected") still propagate. * `find_team_with_model_access`: when none of the `team_ids_jwt_field` groups resolve to a real LiteLLM team, return `(None, None)` instead of raising 403 so the same fallback path runs. If at least one group DID resolve to a team but none granted the requested model, the original 403 is preserved (legitimate access denial — not a claim mismatch). Tracked via the new `any_claim_team_resolved` flag. The strict `is_required_team_id` raise and `enforce_team_based_model_access` raise remain unchanged. Unit tests cover both new soft-fail paths and guard each preserved path (strict required, enforce_team_based, the preserved 403, and the non-HTTPException propagation). Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> * fix(jwt-auth): narrow HTTPException catch to 404 (greptile review) Address Greptile review comments on #28913: * `find_and_validate_specific_team_id`: re-raise HTTPException when `status_code != 404`, pinning the catch to the "team doesn't exist in db" path documented for `get_team_object`. A future change that introduces a different status code (e.g. 403 for a blocked team) will now propagate instead of silently falling through to the single-team DB fallback. * Add `test_find_and_validate_specific_team_id_non_404_http_exception_propagates` parametrised over 400 / 403 / 500 to lock in the contract. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> * fix(jwt-auth): gate claim-mismatch fallback behind opt-in flag The unresolved-team-claim fallback added in the previous commit weakened the strict claim-based authorization contract by default — an authenticated user whose JWT carries a stale or invalid team claim could still consume their single DB team's models/quota via the fallback. Gate both soft-fail paths in `find_and_validate_specific_team_id` and `find_team_with_model_access` behind a new opt-in flag `team_claim_fallback` on `LiteLLM_JWTAuth` (default False). Default-off preserves the pre-existing strict behavior. Operators who intentionally treat IdP team claims as advisory (e.g. machine tokens whose group claims live in a separate namespace from LiteLLM team_ids) opt in via config. Adds two regression tests guarding the default-off behavior. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>