mirror of
https://github.com/tiennm99/litellm.git
synced 2026-07-12 19:04:59 +00:00
ishaan-berri
b593b88ec6
* fix: strip Gemini thought-signature from tool_use.id in non-streaming path; example websearch config (#27873) - adapters/transformation.py: mirror the streaming path and strip the `__thought__<b64>` suffix off `tool_call.id` before building the AnthropicResponseContentBlockToolUse. Base64's `+ / =` characters violate Anthropic's `^[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+$` tool_use.id pattern, so when a conversation that flowed through Gemini is later replayed to an Anthropic-native provider (Bedrock or Anthropic API) the request 400s. - example_config_yaml/websearch_interception_config.yaml: register the interceptor under `callbacks:` not `success_callback:`. `success_callback` does not run pre-request hooks, so the tool-conversion step never fires on `/v1/messages` and the raw `web_search_20250305` tool is forwarded to Bedrock, which 400s. - adds a unit test pinning the non-streaming strip behavior and the surviving `^[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+$` shape of the resulting id. Co-authored-by: oss-agent-shin <279349115+oss-agent-shin@users.noreply.github.com> * Fix/azure image edit auth header (#27863) * fix(azure/image_edit): use api-key header instead of Authorization Bearer Delegate `AzureImageEditConfig.validate_environment` to `BaseAzureLLM._base_validate_azure_environment` so the image-edit route follows the same auth resolution as every other Azure provider: - prefer the Azure-native `api-key` header when an API key is available - fall back to `Authorization: Bearer <azure_ad_token>` only for AAD auth The previous implementation unconditionally set `Authorization: Bearer <api_key>`, which is the OpenAI-direct convention and is rejected by Azure OpenAI / APIM-fronted deployments with `401 Access denied due to missing subscription key`. Adds regression tests covering api_key kwarg, litellm_params.api_key, and the AAD-token fallback path. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> * docs(azure/image_edit): pin api-key precedence semantics + add regression test Address review feedback that the move to ``BaseAzureLLM._base_validate_azure_environment`` changed the relative priority of the positional ``api_key`` kwarg vs. ``litellm_params["api_key"]``. The new behavior — ``litellm_params["api_key"]`` wins, positional only fills in when ``litellm_params["api_key"]`` is empty — is intentional and matches every other Azure ``validate_environment``: ``AzureVideosConfig`` uses the exact same merge logic, while ``AzureVectorStoresConfig`` and ``AzureResponsesAPIConfig`` don't accept a positional ``api_key`` at all. The old ``or`` chain (positional wins) was the outlier and was part of the same OpenAI-vs-Azure convention drift that produced the original ``Authorization: Bearer`` bug. The only production caller (``llm_http_handler.image_edit``) sources both values from the same ``litellm_params.api_key``, so this change is behaviorally a no-op there. Document the precedence in the docstring and lock it in with an explicit test so future refactors can't quietly re-invert it. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> --------- Co-authored-by: yuneng-jiang <yuneng@berri.ai> Co-authored-by: ryan-crabbe-berri <ryan@berri.ai> Co-authored-by: Adam Kirstein <adam.kirstein@disney.com> Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> * test(azure/image_edit): expect api-key header instead of Authorization Bearer PR #27863 fixed Azure image edit to use the Azure-native api-key header instead of OpenAI's Authorization: Bearer convention, but did not update test_azure_image_edit_litellm_sdk to match. The test still asserted 'Authorization' in headers, which now fails since the new code routes through BaseAzureLLM._base_validate_azure_environment and emits api-key when an api_key is provided. Update the assertion to pin the correct Azure behavior: api-key header present with the resolved key, and no Authorization header. --------- Co-authored-by: oss-agent-shin <ext-agent-shin@berri.ai> Co-authored-by: oss-agent-shin <279349115+oss-agent-shin@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Adam Kirstein <107421694+justalittleadam@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: yuneng-jiang <yuneng@berri.ai> Co-authored-by: ryan-crabbe-berri <ryan@berri.ai> Co-authored-by: Adam Kirstein <adam.kirstein@disney.com> Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> Co-authored-by: Ishaan Jaffer <ishaanjaffer0324@gmail.com>
