mirror of
https://github.com/tiennm99/litellm.git
synced 2026-06-17 22:48:35 +00:00
yuneng-jiang
5f75be5c1c
* chore(proxy): route path-dependent call sites through get_request_route Replace direct ``request.url.path`` reads in auth, ACL, routing, and audit-log decisions with ``get_request_route(request)`` — the helper already added in ``auth/auth_utils.py`` that returns the ASGI ``scope["path"]`` with ``root_path`` stripped. Starlette reconstructs ``url.path`` from the Host header; ``scope["path"]`` is uvicorn's parse of the request line and matches what FastAPI dispatches on, so it's the authoritative route for any decision that should agree with the actual handler. Sites: - _experimental/mcp_server/auth/user_api_key_auth_mcp.py - management_endpoints/mcp_management_endpoints.py - vector_store_endpoints/utils.py - pass_through_endpoints/pass_through_endpoints.py - auth/route_checks.py - litellm_pre_call_utils.py - spend_tracking/spend_management_endpoints.py - common_utils/http_parsing_utils.py - management_helpers/utils.py - health_endpoints/_health_endpoints.py Adds regression tests in tests/proxy_unit_tests/test_proxy_routes.py that construct a Request with scope["path"] set to a benign route and the Host header crafted so url.path would resolve differently; each site's decision is asserted against scope["path"]. * chore(proxy): make get_request_route imports lazy at call sites Move the ``from litellm.proxy.auth.auth_utils import get_request_route`` imports added in the prior commit back to the function bodies that use them. The module-level form participates in a long-standing import cycle through ``auth_utils -> _types -> ...`` and was flagged by CodeQL on the PR; the lazy form matches the pattern the proxy already uses for ``user_api_key_auth`` and related helpers elsewhere in these files. Also drop the ``RouteChecks._is_assistants_api_request`` delegation in ``_get_metadata_variable_name`` introduced in the prior commit — the delegation pulled ``RouteChecks`` into the same cycle, and the call site reuses the resolved route for its other branches, so inlining the substring check is both cycle-free and avoids a redundant second ``get_request_route`` call. Comment in test_proxy_routes.py acknowledges that the two MCP table entries exercise ``get_request_route`` directly rather than the full production handler (which needs ASGI scope + MCP state to invoke). --------- Co-authored-by: shin-berri <shin-laptop@berri.ai> Co-authored-by: user <70670632+stuxf@users.noreply.github.com>