mirror of
https://github.com/tiennm99/litellm.git
synced 2026-08-22 08:24:12 +00:00
fix lint
This commit is contained in:
@@ -229,10 +229,10 @@ class AnthropicConfig(AnthropicModelInfo, BaseConfig):
|
||||
- maxItems/minItems: Not supported for array types
|
||||
- minimum/maximum: Not supported for numeric types
|
||||
- minLength/maxLength: Not supported for string types
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
This mirrors the transformation done by the Anthropic Python SDK.
|
||||
See: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/build-with-claude/structured-outputs#how-sdk-transformation-works
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The SDK approach:
|
||||
1. Remove unsupported constraints from schema
|
||||
2. Add constraint info to description (e.g., "Must be at least 100")
|
||||
@@ -242,8 +242,8 @@ class AnthropicConfig(AnthropicModelInfo, BaseConfig):
|
||||
|
||||
Returns:
|
||||
A new dictionary with unsupported fields removed and descriptions updated
|
||||
|
||||
Related issues:
|
||||
|
||||
Related issues:
|
||||
- https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm/issues/19444
|
||||
"""
|
||||
if not isinstance(schema, dict):
|
||||
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ class AnthropicConfig(AnthropicModelInfo, BaseConfig):
|
||||
# All numeric/string/array constraints not supported by Anthropic
|
||||
unsupported_fields = {
|
||||
"maxItems", "minItems", # array constraints
|
||||
"minimum", "maximum", # numeric constraints
|
||||
"minimum", "maximum", # numeric constraints
|
||||
"exclusiveMinimum", "exclusiveMaximum", # numeric constraints
|
||||
"minLength", "maxLength", # string constraints
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1373,7 +1373,7 @@ class AnthropicConfig(AnthropicModelInfo, BaseConfig):
|
||||
raise ValueError(
|
||||
f"Invalid effort value: {effort}. Must be one of: 'high', 'medium', 'low', 'max'"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if effort == "max" and not self._is_claude_opus_4_6(model):
|
||||
if effort == "max" and not self._is_claude_4_6_model(model):
|
||||
raise ValueError(
|
||||
f"effort='max' is only supported by Claude Opus 4.6. Got model: {model}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user