try-claudekit/.claude/commands/spec/create.md

allowed-tools, description, category, argument-hint

allowed-tools	description	category	argument-hint
Read, Write, Grep, Glob, TodoWrite, Task, mcp__context7__resolve-library-id, mcp__context7__get-library-docs, Bash(ls:*), Bash(echo:*), Bash(command:*), Bash(npm:*), Bash(claude:*)	Generate a spec file for a new feature or bugfix	validation	<feature-or-bugfix-description>

Context

• Existing specs: !ls -la specs/ 2>/dev/null || echo "No specs directory found"

Optional: Enhanced Library Documentation Support

Context7 MCP server provides up-to-date library documentation for better spec creation.

Check if Context7 is available: !command -v context7-mcp || echo "NOT_INSTALLED"

If NOT_INSTALLED and the feature involves external libraries, offer to enable Context7:

████ Optional: Enable Context7 for Enhanced Documentation ████

Context7 provides up-to-date library documentation to improve spec quality.
This is optional but recommended when working with external libraries.

Would you like me to install Context7 for you? I can:
  1. Install globally: npm install -g @upstash/context7-mcp
  2. Add to Claude Code: claude mcp add context7 context7-mcp

Or you can install it manually later if you prefer.

If user agrees to installation:

• Run: npm install -g @upstash/context7-mcp
• Then run: claude mcp add context7 context7-mcp
• Verify installation and proceed with enhanced documentation support

If user declines or wants to continue without it:

• Proceed with spec creation using existing knowledge

FIRST PRINCIPLES PROBLEM ANALYSIS

Before defining any solution, validate the problem from first principles:

Core Problem Investigation

• Strip Away Solution Assumptions: What is the core problem, completely separate from any proposed solution?
• Root Cause Analysis: Why does this problem exist? What created this need?
• Goal Decomposition: What are we fundamentally trying to achieve for users/business?
• Success Definition: What would success look like if we had unlimited resources and no constraints?
• Alternative Approaches: Could we achieve the underlying goal without building anything? Are there simpler approaches?

Problem Validation Questions

• Real vs. Perceived: Is this solving a real problem that users actually have?
• Assumption Audit: What assumptions about user needs, technical constraints, or business requirements might be wrong?
• Value Proposition: What is the minimum viable solution that delivers core value?
• Scope Validation: Are we solving the right problem, or treating symptoms of a deeper issue?

CRITICAL: Only proceed if the core problem is clearly defined and validated. If uncertain, request additional context.

MANDATORY PRE-CREATION VERIFICATION

After validating the problem from first principles, complete these technical checks:

1. Context Discovery Phase

• Search existing codebase for similar features/specs using AgentTool
• Use specialized subagents when research involves specific domains (TypeScript, React, testing, databases, etc.)
• Run claudekit list agents to see available specialized experts
• Match research requirements to expert domains for optimal analysis
• Use general-purpose approach only when no specialized expert fits
• Identify potential conflicts or duplicates
• Verify feature request is technically feasible
• Document any missing prerequisites

2. Request Validation

• Confirm request is well-defined and actionable
• If vague or incomplete, STOP and ask clarifying questions
• Validate scope is appropriate (not too broad/narrow)

3. Quality Gate

• Only proceed if you have 80%+ confidence in implementation approach
• If uncertain, request additional context before continuing
• Document any assumptions being made

CRITICAL: If any validation fails, STOP immediately and request clarification.

Your task

Create a comprehensive specification document in the specs/ folder for the following feature/bugfix: $ARGUMENTS

First, analyze the request to understand:

1. Whether this is a feature or bugfix
2. The scope and complexity
3. Related existing code/features
4. External libraries/frameworks involved

If the feature involves external libraries or frameworks AND Context7 is available:

• Use mcp__context7__resolve-library-id to find the library
• Use mcp__context7__get-library-docs to get up-to-date documentation
• Reference official patterns and best practices from the docs

END-TO-END INTEGRATION ANALYSIS

Before writing the detailed specification, map the complete system impact:

System Integration Mapping

• Data Flow Tracing: Trace data flow from user action → processing → storage → response
• Service Dependencies: Identify all affected services, APIs, databases, and external systems
• Integration Points: Map every place this feature touches existing functionality
• Cross-System Impact: How does this change affect other teams, services, or user workflows?

Complete User Journey Analysis

• Entry Points: How do users discover and access this feature?
• Step-by-Step Flow: What is the complete sequence from start to finish?
• Error Scenarios: What happens when things go wrong at each step?
• Exit Points: How does this connect to what users do next?

Deployment and Rollback Considerations

• Migration Path: How do we get from current state to new state?
• Rollback Strategy: What if we need to undo this feature?
• Deployment Dependencies: What must be deployed together vs. independently?
• Data Migration: How do we handle existing data during the transition?

VERIFICATION: Ensure you can trace the complete end-to-end flow before proceeding to detailed specification.

Then create a spec document that includes:

1. Title: Clear, descriptive title of the feature/bugfix
2. Status: Draft/Under Review/Approved/Implemented
3. Authors: Your name and date
4. Overview: Brief description and purpose
5. Background/Problem Statement: Why this feature is needed or what problem it solves
6. Goals: What we aim to achieve (bullet points)
7. Non-Goals: What is explicitly out of scope (bullet points)
8. Technical Dependencies:
   • External libraries/frameworks used
   • Version requirements
   • Links to relevant documentation
9. Detailed Design:
   • Architecture changes
   • Implementation approach
   • Code structure and file organization
   • API changes (if any)
   • Data model changes (if any)
   • Integration with external libraries (with examples from docs)
10. User Experience: How users will interact with this feature
11. Testing Strategy:
    • Unit tests
    • Integration tests
    • E2E tests (if needed)
    • Mocking strategies for external dependencies
    • Test documentation: Each test should include a purpose comment explaining why it exists and what it validates
    • Meaningful tests: Avoid tests that always pass regardless of behavior
    • Edge case testing: Include tests that can fail to reveal real issues
12. Performance Considerations: Impact on performance and mitigation strategies
13. Security Considerations: Security implications and safeguards
14. Documentation: What documentation needs to be created/updated
15. Implementation Phases:
    • Phase 1: MVP/Core functionality
    • Phase 2: Enhanced features (if applicable)
    • Phase 3: Polish and optimization (if applicable)
16. Open Questions: Any unresolved questions or decisions
17. References:
    • Links to related issues, PRs, or documentation
    • External library documentation links
    • Relevant design patterns or architectural decisions

Follow these guidelines:

• Use Markdown format similar to existing specs
• Be thorough and technical but also accessible
• Include code examples where helpful (especially from library docs)
• Consider edge cases and error scenarios
• Reference existing project patterns and conventions
• Use diagrams if they would clarify complex flows (using ASCII art or mermaid)
• When referencing external libraries, include version-specific information
• Do NOT include time or effort estimations (no "X days", "Y hours", or complexity estimates)

Name the spec file descriptively based on the feature:

• Features: feat-{kebab-case-name}.md
• Bugfixes: fix-{issue-number}-{brief-description}.md

PROGRESSIVE VALIDATION CHECKPOINTS

After completing each major section:

• Problem Statement: Verify it's specific and measurable
• Technical Requirements: Confirm all dependencies are available
• Implementation Plan: Validate approach is technically sound
• Testing Strategy: Ensure testability of all requirements

At each checkpoint, if quality is insufficient, revise before proceeding.

FINAL SPECIFICATION VALIDATION

Before marking complete:

1. Completeness Check: All 17 sections meaningfully filled
2. Consistency Check: No contradictions between sections
3. Implementability Check: Someone could build this from the spec
4. Quality Score: Rate spec 1-10, only accept 8+

Before writing, use AgentTool to search for:

• Related existing features or code
• Similar patterns in the codebase
• Potential conflicts or dependencies
• Current library versions in package.json or equivalent